Founder's Note
The most profound technologies aren't always the ones that make the headlines — sometimes they're the ones that kept our ancestors alive through a cold night, 10,000 years ago. This story is a reminder that human ingenuity isn't a modern invention; it's our oldest inheritance.
— Sanjay Verma, Founder · NavsoraTimesIn This Article
- The Find That Almost Got Ignored
- Why Did Mesolithic People Carry Fungi?
- How Did They Actually Turn a Mushroom Into Fire?
- What the Burnt and Sliced Specimens Tell Us
- A Habit Written Across a Continent
Your lighter runs out of gas. Your matches are damp. That creeping panic — how do I make fire? — is one of the most human feelings there is. Hunter-gatherers at a Yorkshire lake around 9,000 BC felt exactly the same way. They had a solution in their kit. It was a fungus — and archaeologist Harry K. Robson's 2018 analysis of the Star Carr assemblage reveals just how deliberate that choice really was.
The Find That Almost Got Ignored
Star Carr in North Yorkshire is already famous — it's produced Britain's oldest known house, red deer antler headdresses, and worked bone and flint. But bracket fungi barely made the footnotes. When the site was first excavated in the 1950s, botanist E.J.H. Corner identified some specimens and suggested tinder use. The director noted it in a single paragraph. For decades, that was the whole story. Fresh excavations from 2006 to 2015 changed everything — pulling into focus an assemblage of 82 fungi, most burnt, many deliberately processed, preserved in peat for ten millennia.
Why Did Mesolithic People Carry Fungi?
The short answer: because Fomes fomentarius is one of the most reliable fire-starters in northern Europe's forests. Its hard outer crust makes it durable to carry. Its inner flesh, once prepared, holds a smoulder long enough to transport between camps. Ethnographic records from indigenous groups in British Columbia document people carrying smouldering polypore flesh inside birch bark rolls for exactly this purpose. The species distribution at Star Carr makes the intentionality unmistakable — 76 of 78 identified specimens (97.4%) are Fomes fomentarius. Someone was selecting for it, specifically, repeatedly.
How Did They Actually Turn a Mushroom Into Fire?
The process demands real craft knowledge. Strip the hard grey crust. Remove the spore tubes. Soak or boil the remaining flesh for hours, then pound it with a smooth stone until it's nearly leather-like. Dry it carefully — too much heat hardens it. Char the surface slightly so it's primed to catch a spark. When flint strikes iron pyrite, the spark lands on the amadou, which smoulders. Transfer that smoulder to a dry grass bundle and blow it into flame. These people weren't improvising. They were running a system.
"Since the majority of the assemblage exhibits signs of burning and/or modification, Fomes fomentarius were probably preferentially selected for their tinder and primarily used as fire starters."
— Robson, University of York · Star Carr Volume 2, 2018What the Burnt and Sliced Specimens Tell Us
Of the 81 recently excavated specimens, 54 show clear modification — outer surfaces stripped, interior flesh removed in strips, brackets reduced to their usable core. Forty-one are charred, ranging from lightly scorched to fully carbonised. One has two clear incision marks. Only one specimen was found still attached to a tree. The other 80 were carried to the site by people. This isn't accidental burning — it's a staged process: collect, prepare, use, discard.
A Habit Written Across a Continent
Robson's literature review found fungi at 18 Mesolithic sites across northern Europe — Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, Russia. At Neustadt, specimens had scrape marks consistent with tinder preparation. At Rødbyhavn, one bracket had been decorated with cross-hatching. At Tybrind Vig, two of fourteen specimens were modified. This is a shared technology, transmitted across generations and geography. The open questions are rich: how was this knowledge passed on? Through trade networks, direct contact, or something else entirely? And what other perishable technologies — wrapped in bark, made of wood and fibre and fungus — simply haven't survived to tell us what else these people knew?
- Fungi as technology, not forage — The Star Carr assemblage shows deliberate species selection, preparation, and use, confirming that bracket fungi were a managed resource, not an opportunistic find.
- Perishables rewrite prehistory — Waterlogged and peat sites like Star Carr preserve organic materials that simply don't survive elsewhere, meaning our picture of Stone Age life is almost certainly incomplete wherever such conditions are absent.
- Knowledge travels — The near-identical use of tinder fungi across 18 Mesolithic sites from Yorkshire to Russia suggests that practical knowledge moved across Mesolithic Europe far more systematically than the stone tool record alone reveals.
"Given the numerous uses of fungi documented in this chapter, it is likely that those recovered from Star Carr had probably been intentionally gathered by the site's inhabitants." — Robson, H.K., Star Carr Volume 2: Studies in Technology, Subsistence and Environment, White Rose University Press, 2018.
📄 Source & Citation
Primary Source: Robson, H.K. (2018). The Star Carr Fungi. In: Milner, N., Conneller, C. and Taylor, B. (eds.) Star Carr Volume 2: Studies in Technology, Subsistence and Environment, pp. 437–445. York: White Rose University Press. https://doi.org/10.22599/book2.q
Full Text: This chapter is available open-access via ResearchGate: researchgate.net/publication/324538207_The_Star_Carr_Fungi
Authors & Affiliations: Harry K. Robson, University of York (Department of Archaeology)
Data & Code: Spatial data plotted via GIS; full assemblage tables available in the published volume via White Rose University Press open-access portal.
Key Themes: Mesolithic Archaeology · Fire Technology · Ethnobotany · Star Carr · Prehistoric Europe
Supporting References:
[1] Clark, J.G.D. (1954). Excavations at Star Carr. Cambridge University Press.
[2] Andersen, S.H. (2013). Tybrind Vig: Submerged Mesolithic Settlements in Denmark. Jutland Archaeological Society.
[3] Peintner, U. and Pöder, R. (2000). Ethnomycological remarks on the Iceman's fungi. In: Bortenschlager, S. and Oeggl, K. (eds.) The Iceman and His Natural Environment, pp. 143–150. Springer.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.
Leave a Comment